soraya ghorehjili; mohammadhossein rahmati; Javad PourKarimi
Abstract
Abstract At the present age, our universities need leaders who can balance both routine management and new activities in complex sittuations, and these emerging leaders are leadership Model of Universities Based on grounded theory (Case Study: Tehran State University) The main purpose of this research ...
Read More
Abstract At the present age, our universities need leaders who can balance both routine management and new activities in complex sittuations, and these emerging leaders are leadership Model of Universities Based on grounded theory (Case Study: Tehran State University) The main purpose of this research is to design an ambidextrous leadership model in public universities conducted using the Glazier grounded theory method. Data gathering tool was semi-structured interviews with 11 experts in the field of higher education who were selected by theoretical sampling. The ambidextrous leadership concepts and components (106 key concepts, 25 primary and 7 secondary) of the interviews were identified and formulated in the context of the grounded theory conceptual model. According to the research findings, the central category is ambidextrous leadership. The results showed that the components of individual abilities include (individual abilities, individual skills, attitude, behavior and motivation), strategic planning (targeting, foresight), ethics-oriented and service-oriented. (Adherence to ethical skills, service and accountability, continuous supervision); university macro management including (knowledge management, continuous development and improvement of knowledge, participatory management, utilization of human capital capabilities, financial management, professional development Faculty members; Developing scientific collaborations (connecting with industry, commercializing and internationalizing universities); Taking advantage of opportunities including (recruitment capability, management Facilities, identifying capabilities); Coordination and flexibility include (communication skills, balance management, design management). These results are presented in the form of a data base model for the use of university presidents and faculty members.
Keyvan Fardaeibenam; Saeed Rajaeepour; Javad Pourkarimi
Abstract
The present study aimed to identify and validate the excellent human resource criteria among the staff of the Judiciary. The research design was mixed-method and the research data in the qualitative section were collected based on purposeful sampling and through semi-structured interviews with managers, ...
Read More
The present study aimed to identify and validate the excellent human resource criteria among the staff of the Judiciary. The research design was mixed-method and the research data in the qualitative section were collected based on purposeful sampling and through semi-structured interviews with managers, experts and faculty members specialized in the field of human resources (n=13). In the quantitative part, a sample of 410 people was selected from all managers and experts of the judiciary based on the clusters sampling method, and the research data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire. Reliability of data in qualitative dimension was verified by peer review and reliability of findings was verified based on reviewing of findings by interviewees. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts and the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by Cranach’s alpha formula (0.987). Excellence in human resource criteria among the Judiciary staff was determined in the form of technical excellence criteria (job knowledge, professional competencies), Emotional excellence (personality traits, individual, and organizational attitudes), and skill excellence (perceptual abilities, communicational abilities, and administrative abilities). Also, the construct validity of the model of excellent human resource criteria was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis..
